The days of being a spiritual mentor in Meiman

Chapter 3194 The Detective is about to die (Forty-five)

"Then let's talk about Madeleine." Schiller said again: "I think you should also see that Madeleine is not a normal person. In fact, I highly doubt that this seemingly pitiful woman is The real murderer of their family’s massacre.”

Batman finally came to his senses as Schiller began to speculate, so he asked, "Why are you so suspicious?"

"Because of that research notebook."

It's finally here, Batman thought. Sure enough, every Schiller can directly guess the truth through a little bit of fragmentary clues.

When Schiller mentioned the research notes, Batman believed that he could only use psychoanalysis to reach the conclusion that Madeleine was the murderer.

Because there is actually nothing wrong with the notebook and it is not enough evidence to judge a person's personality, but Schiller still said this, indicating that he may have empathized with something.

Unexpectedly, Schiller said: "According to my experience, Madeleine behaved too coldly when mentioning what happened to her family. She may be a narcissistic psychopath."

"Experience? What experience?"

"Some... experience in dealing with criminals." Schiller paused and then continued: "I have seen many similar murderers, and they all gave me this feeling."

"So it's also a feeling?"

Schiller shook his head and said, "I'm just making a general statement. If you must pursue details, I can say that Madeleine's wording has an obvious God's perspective, macroscopic and objective."

Schiller leaned back in his chair and said while recalling: "Everyone lives in the first person, so when describing what they saw, it must be subjective."

"For example, when murderers confess the facts of their crimes, they will conceal something. Some of them are to deliberately reduce their guilt, but some of them are unintentional."

"And some of these inadvertent concealments are because their brains beautify themselves, while others are due to information gaps caused by subjective perspectives."

"They often say 'I saw' or 'I thought', which is an obviously subjective narrative, such as 'I saw him lying in the corner with blood on his face, and I wondered if he was dead'.

"These are some confessions that I often hear, and I think you should also hear them often, because although many murderers are brutal, they are mentally normal and are not madmen or perverts. This kind of narrative method is what normal people should have."

"And Madeleine is not. Her perspective of describing such an incident is 'someone fell in a corner somewhere, and he was killed.' This is not a subjective narrative at all, but more like an objective judgment. ”

"If what she is talking about has nothing to do with her, it may still be explained, but she is describing the death of her relatives. Once the identities of her relatives are put into it, you will find that this sentence is terrifyingly cold and indifferent."

"Who on earth would describe the death of a loved one by directly saying, 'My mother fell in the corner of the kitchen, she was killed,' 'My sister was lying on the dining table, with a triangular hole in her chest,' or 'The father was lying face down on the stairs with two blood stains on the top of his arm'?"

"Perhaps Madeleine later was very good, and she learned how to summarize one thing in the most concise words, but she was not very old when she experienced all this, and her subjective consciousness is more easily affected by emotions, so what remains in her memory is The picture shouldn't be as clear and objective as an autopsy report. Even if she talks about a bunch of monsters, I think it's more normal."

"This proves that when Madeleine experienced all this, she did not break down because of fear. She did not even feel fear. She accepted it all calmly, remembered it all, and remained calm after many years. Can retell it clearly."

"This is actually a very scary thing. If this whole thing is not a disaster for her, then what is the possibility that she became a survivor because of luck?"

"To sum up, I think Madeleine has a mental disorder and is more likely to be a born psychopath. Of course, there is no substantive evidence to speculate that she caused this tragedy, but it is absolutely impossible for her to A completely innocent victim, as she described herself."

After listening to all this, Batman discovered that Schiller has a very keen insight and is also a very good detective regardless of analytical methods.

But Batman couldn't put aside the analysis method, because he had already figured out these conclusions after reading Madeleine's diary, and what he wanted was something deeper behind it.

"Psychopath?" Batman asked. This kind of thing involving professional psychological knowledge may lead to Schiller's analysis of Madeleine's personality.

But what I didn't expect was that Schiller began to analyze the clown.

He uses the distinction between Madeleine and the Joker as an introduction, giving Batman a profound argument for the difference between a psychopath and a sociopath.

Many people say that the Joker is a lunatic, but to be more specific, he is a person with antisocial personality disorder and is mentally ill in a broad sense, but he is not a lunatic in the public perception.

The reason has been mentioned before. The clown is rational and all his actions are profit-oriented. But because the interests he pursues are inherently evil, it makes him look crazy.

The biggest difference between psychopaths and psychopaths is that psychopaths are not profit-oriented, but desire-oriented.

Let me put it this way. Throughout history, many celebrities in the upper class have antisocial personality disorder, and even in modern times, many people have admitted this.

The reason for this problem is that antisocial personality disorder is highly profit-oriented, even excessively profit-oriented, which means that they will do whatever it takes to achieve their own interests, ignoring all social rules, morality, and even instincts and destroying humanity.

Although it is a bit cruel, it has to be admitted that this kind of character that does not recognize relatives is more likely to achieve success in the sociological sense.

It is not that upper-class people are more likely to suffer from antisocial personality disorder, but that antisocial personality disorder is more likely to become upper-class people.

But people often see psychopaths in the lower class.

Don't think that psychopaths are crazy and go to the streets with knives to slash people. There are very few people who are serious to this extent, but mild psychopaths are widely present among the public.

One of their typical characteristics is that they harm others but do not benefit themselves.

This is exactly the opposite of the high profit orientation of antisocial personality disorder. Psychopaths do not pursue interests, and can even give up interests to satisfy their own desires.

For example, when a game is about to be won, teammates give up, group work is about to be completed, someone messes up, the project is going smoothly, and the troublemaker comes, the child has found a good job, and they must ruin it.

More importantly, these troublemakers are actually members of the team, which is commonly known as the insider.

Many people think that such people are unreasonable, because it is obvious that this matter is developing in a good direction and is also beneficial to them.

They can get points when the game is won, and they also benefit from the praise of the group work by the teacher, but they have to make trouble, just like crazy, and their logic cannot be understood no matter what.

But in fact, this is a manifestation of mental abnormality.

They want to give up when the game is won, not because they don’t want to get points, but because they simply feel that they can’t let their teammates be happy, or more accurately, they can’t let their teammates be happier than me.

There is no wrong version in the one-book-one-bar of 16-9!

The group assignment is almost finished, and they want to make trouble. It's not that they are not afraid of being reprimanded by the teacher, but rather than being reprimanded by the teacher together, they don't want other students to have more weight in the teacher's heart than them.

Other things are similar, so this kind of psychopath has a prefix, called narcissism.

To be more specific, in order to prevent anyone from surpassing themselves in any aspect, they can sacrifice any interests to satisfy their perverted desires.

It is conceivable that such people cannot get along well.

Giving away some heads in the game or ruining a group assignment is indeed not a failure, but the key is that the symptoms of this kind of psychopath cannot be controlled freely. When they make key choices in life, they will also succumb to perverted desires and give up the benefits that are at their fingertips.

Losing a city today and a pond tomorrow, sooner or later you will give up your entire life.

If you observe this kind of people carefully, you will find that most of their real lives are failures.

Some of them may be able to disguise themselves for a while, but they will definitely make a few wrong key choices like crazy, making their ugly faces known to everyone, and then messing up their lives.

Many people may wonder why some people are not incapable or stupid, but they lose their minds at the critical moment of their lives, and they are declining all the way until they fall to the bottom, and they can't turn the situation around no matter how hard they struggle.

Most people think that they are unlucky, but in fact, they may be psychopaths who succumb to their abnormal desires and ignore their interests.

In Schiller's view, Madeleine's life trajectory is very consistent with this standard, probably ups and downs, until she died, she did not achieve the goals she set for herself.

If this character was made up by someone else, there is still a certain possibility of coincidence, but it was Greed who made up this character. He is a psychologist and is familiar with similar cases.

Another evidence that convinced Schiller that Madeleine had mental problems was that Greed was a very greedy person. He would not only seek profit when he could gain both fame and fortune.

He set himself up as a rich second-generation, which was not unexpected, but he made himself an unscrupulous capitalist who oppressed the lower class, which was actually inconsistent with his logic.

In the case where the background story can be set at will, he can set himself up as a rich and righteous person. Money is not completely linked to evil. If you can have all, why only one?

So Schiller firmly believes that there must be a reversal in the background story set by greed for himself, and the most difficult to whitewash is to not pay compensation to Madeline's family.

If this case does not meet the compensation standards in itself and is a fraud case deliberately designed by someone, then there is nothing wrong with what the Siltek Medical Insurance Company did, and greed will naturally be whitewashed.

The life experience written in Madeline's research notebook is naturally a foreshadowing of greed, and it can become strong evidence that Madeline is the villain.

Schiller believes that as long as the notebook is sent to a professional mental appraisal agency for appraisal, it will definitely be concluded that Madeline is mentally abnormal, which is what greed did deliberately.

I can only say that it is fortunate that it was Bruce who played the role of the psychiatrist in this story, and because of his amazing academic level, he failed to discover the error in the notes at the first time.

Others could not say anything because they found out that it was not their job, so Greedy was able to maintain the image of the villain.

At this time, Schiller suddenly realized that if Greedy wanted to play a decent role, it would not work just by reversing the refusal to pay. In addition to whitewashing the human experiment, he also had to give a reasonable explanation for inviting everyone to the laboratory, otherwise, wouldn't he still be a kidnapper?

If this is the case, then Batman allowed others to be invited to the laboratory even though he knew all this. Did he guess that Greedy was not going to do anything to them?

Schiller couldn't help but look at Batman again, thinking that he really deserves to be Batman.

:D